
This semester at seminary I am going through the rather arduous process of relearning how to read the Bible. As a sort of Bible scholar I have (up to recently) felt confident in my ability to "rightly divide scripture." Especially, when it comes to delivering the truths of God to other people.
However, it appears that I lacked what would be called a consistent "Biblical Hermeneutic" thus when I read the Bible I throw all of what I know into the interpretation in an effort to make it read in a certain way. I would say that I have always tried to be faithful to Christian theology; however, in the midst of that sometimes I use passages to say something other than what they rather clearly state.
So, instead of searching out the "authorial intention" of a verse. I read the verse under the prism of Christianity. I suppose what I am attempting to say is that I don't read the Bible well. To be fair, I am not alone in my misunderstandings of the Bible, it just has been brought to my attention recently. Often what I read and how I interpret is the thoughts and ideas of former pastors and teachers who (themselves mis-read the Bible) taught truths that I embraced and passed down to others. They were probably mis-taught the same thing by their pastors of yesteryear and so on, and so on. I suppose this is the same problem that Mary Magdalene has suffered as she has been confused with a harlot for generations because some pope (way back when) combined her with the woman caught in adultery of the previous story in the Bible. Still today, people will say that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute, which just isn't a biblical statement. In any event, I will avoid any finger pointing (save at myself) and offer one of the examples of poor Bible interpretation of which I have been guilty.
SPOILER ALERT - this may be my text for Sunday as I am preaching, so if you will be listening to that sermon, you may wait for the full exposition and not this small sample.
Luke 15 (NIV)
The Parable of the Lost Sheep
1Now the tax collectors and "sinners" were all gathering around to hear him. 2But the Pharisees and the teachers of the law muttered, "This man welcomes sinners and eats with them."
3Then Jesus told them this parable: 4"Suppose one of you has a hundred sheep and loses one of them. Does he not leave the ninety-nine in the open country and go after the lost sheep until he finds it? 5And when he finds it, he joyfully puts it on his shoulders 6and goes home. Then he calls his friends and neighbors together and says, 'Rejoice with me; I have found my lost sheep.' 7I tell you that in the same way there will be more rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who do not need to repent.
The common (mis)interpretation of this is that God/Jesus would leave the 99 sheep to find the one that is lost (I mean after all the "Son of Man came to seek and to save that which was lost). But unfortunately we read this passage too quickly and jump too readily to our pre-fitted conclusion. The reality is this is a parable that Jesus offers, to whom and for what purpose?
This parable is directed at the Pharisees and the teachers of the Law, as they were angry that Jesus would eat with sinners. Then Jesus looks at the Pharisees and teachers and offers them the parable of the lost sheep and the parable of the lost coin. What one must realize is that it is clear that there is one person who the shepherd cannot be in the story... Jesus. Read verse 4 again. Do you see it? Suppose one of you. One of YOU. Not suppose a man, or suppose I... It is basically Jesus saying, Suppose one of you pharisees had...
You see it right? Jesus isn't the shepherd, and honestly the shepherd isn't that praiseworthy. Nor is the woman who lost the coin in the next story. In fact if you move to the most well known story in chapter 15 (The Prodigal Son) you will see that the antagonist of the story (the other brother) is concerned about the wasting of money and animal on his returned ruffian of a brother. Wasting of Money (the lost coin) and an animal (the lost sheep).
Jesus wraps up the three stories by saying that people are more important than possessions. Even the sinners who he was scoffed at for associating with were more valuable than a coin or sheep (that the Pharisees would seek out to save). You can compare this to how God chides Jonah at the conclusion of the book when his heart valued cattle more than people (Jon. 4:11).
Does this blow your mind like it did for me? Seriously. What else have I been taught, internalized and then retaught that is good, moral, even true statements but used a text in the Bible which says nearly the exact opposite. It's a tad bit scary. A tad scary, indeed.
Thoughts?




